All settlements
Claims not open yetProof TBD

Toyota

Toyota Door Lock Actuator Lawsuit Names RAV4, Camry, Tacoma and More

Toyota models in the door lock actuator lawsuit include RAV4 (2013-present), Camry (2012-2024) and Tacoma (2005-2023). No payout yet. Follow the case.

Potential payment
Payment varies

Subject to eligibility and claim terms.

Claim deadline
TBD
Proof requirement
TBD

Eligibility

Who may qualify?

Check the covered dates, products, locations, and other official terms before you file.

  • You are a current or former owner or lessee of one of the Toyota models named in the lawsuit.
  • 4Runner (2010–2024)
  • Highlander (2014–present)
  • Prius (2010–2022)
  • RAV4 (2013–present)
  • Tundra (2007–present)
  • Camry (2012–2024)
  • Camry Hybrid (2012–2024)
  • Corolla (2014–present)
  • Tacoma (2005–2023)
  • FJ Cruiser (2007–2014)

Case overview

What is the Toyota case about?

A new proposed class action accuses Toyota of selling vehicles with defective door lock actuators, the small electric motors that raise and lower the door latch, in nearly a dozen models. According to the complaint, these actuators tend to fail prematurely, frequently right around or just after the 3-year/36,000-mile warranty expires. When one fails, the affected door may stop locking or unlocking via the key fob or interior power switches, which the lawsuit says creates a real safety risk: occupants could become trapped during an emergency, and the vehicle is left more exposed to theft.

The models named in the suit include the 4Runner (2010–2024), RAV4 (2013–present), Highlander (2014–present), Prius (2010–2022), Tundra (2007–present), Camry (2012–2024), Camry Hybrid (2012–2024), Corolla (2014–present), Tacoma (2005–2023), and FJ Cruiser (2007–2014).

The complaint alleges Toyota was aware of the issue for years, citing customer complaints, dealer repair records, NHTSA reports, and the automaker's own testing, but chose not to issue a recall. Instead, the lawsuit claims Toyota routinely told owners the failed part was a "maintenance" or "wear" item excluded from warranty coverage. Toyota has not yet filed a formal response, so its position isn't reflected in the complaint, which alleges the company denies the defect exists.

Case details

Company
Toyota Motor Corporation

Settlement administrator and official sources

  • Listing verification
    Last checked Oct 7, 2026