
Starbucks
Starbucks Lawsuit Alleges Misleading Ethical Sourcing and Decaf VOCs
Consumers allege Starbucks misled buyers with its 100% Ethical Coffee Sourcing claims. This is a lawsuit only, with no settlement yet. Follow the case.
- Potential payment
- Est. $200
Subject to eligibility and claim terms.
- Claim deadline
- TBD
- Proof requirement
- TBD
Eligibility
Who may qualify?
Check the covered dates, products, locations, and other official terms before you file.
Case overview
What is the Starbucks case about?
A newly filed lawsuit accuses Starbucks of misleading customers through its coffee marketing. According to the complaint, Starbucks promoted its beans as 'Committed to 100% Ethical Coffee Sourcing' and pointed to its C.A.F.E. Practices program (Coffee and Farmer Equity Practices) as proof of rigorous ethical standards.
Plaintiffs argue this messaging was deceptive, claiming that multiple sources have documented serious labor abuses, including forced labor, child labor, unsafe working conditions, and wage theft, at farms and suppliers that provide Starbucks coffee, even some farms certified under the C.A.F.E. program.
The suit further alleges that Starbucks failed to disclose the presence of certain volatile organic compounds and industrial solvents, such as benzene, toluene, and methylene chloride, in some of its decaffeinated coffee products.
No settlement has been reached in this case, it remains an active lawsuit, and no compensation is currently available to consumers.
Case details
- Company
- Starbucks Corporation
Settlement administrator and official sources
- Listing verificationLast checked Oct 7, 2026